Main Details: Registry number APL_59329/2024 Date 14 January, 2025 Parties TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v. Texas Instruments Deutschland GmbH, Texas Instruments EMEA Sales GmbH Order/Decision reference ORD_68780/2024 Type of action Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: - An order on security for costs pursuant to R. 158 RoP is a case management order. Such orders can be reviewed by the panel on its own motion or at the request of a party (R. 333 RoP). - If the judge-rapporteur or presiding judge issues an order on security for costs, the judge-rapporteur or presiding judge is not competent to decide on leave to appeal. Leave to appeal should be assessed by the panel after panel review. English Keywords: Composition of the Court, panel review Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number APL_59329/2024 Date 14 January, 2025 Parties TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v. Texas Instruments Deutschland GmbH, Texas Instruments EMEA Sales GmbH Order/Decision reference ORD_68780/2024 Type of action Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: - An order on security for costs pursuant to R. 158 RoP is a case management order. Such orders can be reviewed by the panel on its own motion or at the request of a party (R. 333 RoP). - If the judge-rapporteur or presiding judge issues an order on security for costs, the judge-rapporteur or presiding judge is not competent to decide on leave to appeal. Leave to appeal should be assessed by the panel after panel review. English Keywords: Composition of the Court, panel review Back to Decisions and Orders