Main Details: Registry number App_18755/2025 Date 22. April 2025 Parties Longi (Netherlands) Trading B.V., LONGi Solar Technologie GmbH, Energy3000 solar GmbH, LONGI SOLAR FRANCE SARL. Order/Decision reference ORD_19051/2025 Type of action Generic application Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division English Headnotes: 1) The statement of claim shall be deemed to have been served on defendant 2) on 14 March 2025. 2) For defendants 1), 2), 3), 5) and 6), the time limit for lodging a defence and a counterclaim for revocation is set / extended to 21 July 2025. 3) In main workflows with automatic invitation to file a reply infringement action; CC, application to amend; preliminary objection), each defendant must upload a reply on its own. It is sufficient for one of the defendants to upload exhibits only once for all defendants. In the case of ancillary workflows (requests for extensions of time, etc.) it is sufficient for one defendant to start the workflow on behalf of all the others. The same applies to the two claimants. English Schlüsselwörter: deadline extension, service, multiple defendants Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number App_18755/2025 Date 22. April 2025 Parties Longi (Netherlands) Trading B.V., LONGi Solar Technologie GmbH, Energy3000 solar GmbH, LONGI SOLAR FRANCE SARL. Order/Decision reference ORD_19051/2025 Type of action Generic application Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division English Headnotes: 1) The statement of claim shall be deemed to have been served on defendant 2) on 14 March 2025. 2) For defendants 1), 2), 3), 5) and 6), the time limit for lodging a defence and a counterclaim for revocation is set / extended to 21 July 2025. 3) In main workflows with automatic invitation to file a reply infringement action; CC, application to amend; preliminary objection), each defendant must upload a reply on its own. It is sufficient for one of the defendants to upload exhibits only once for all defendants. In the case of ancillary workflows (requests for extensions of time, etc.) it is sufficient for one defendant to start the workflow on behalf of all the others. The same applies to the two claimants. English Schlüsselwörter: deadline extension, service, multiple defendants Back to Decisions and Orders