Main Details: Registry number App_16648/2025 Date 17. April 2025 Parties Fujifilm Corporation v. Kodak Holding GmbH, Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH Order/Decision reference ORD_17206/2025 Type of action Application Rop 223 Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: Where there is an uncontested fact as meant in R. 171.2 RoP, this does not imply that the legal consequence for which this fact was submitted automatically follows. It still falls upon the Court to decide whether the facts advanced justify such a legal consequence English Schlüsselwörter: uncontested fact (R. 171.2 RoP), - suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number App_16648/2025 Date 17. April 2025 Parties Fujifilm Corporation v. Kodak Holding GmbH, Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH Order/Decision reference ORD_17206/2025 Type of action Application Rop 223 Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: Where there is an uncontested fact as meant in R. 171.2 RoP, this does not imply that the legal consequence for which this fact was submitted automatically follows. It still falls upon the Court to decide whether the facts advanced justify such a legal consequence English Schlüsselwörter: uncontested fact (R. 171.2 RoP), - suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) Back to Decisions and Orders