Main Details: Case number UPC_CoA_523/2024 Registry number APL_51115/2024 Date 19 décembre, 2024 Parties Sumi Agro Limited; Sumi Agro Europe Limited v. Syngenta Limited Order/Decision reference ORD_56404/2024 Type of action Procedural Order Language of Proceedings Anglais Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) Headnotes: - A party has submitted new evidence in the appeal proceedings. In view of the fact that the party had submitted other pages from the same publication in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal considers that the party has not justified that additional pages from the same publication could not reasonably have been made during the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. The evidence will thus be disregarded by the Court of Appeal. - Evidence relating to a possible new version of a contested embodiment, following statements made by the alleged infringer that a product ingredient has been changed, will be regarded in view of explanations on when and why samples of the product were purchased and analysed. Mots-clés: New evidence, R.222.2 RoP Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Case number UPC_CoA_523/2024 Registry number APL_51115/2024 Date 19 décembre, 2024 Parties Sumi Agro Limited; Sumi Agro Europe Limited v. Syngenta Limited Order/Decision reference ORD_56404/2024 Type of action Procedural Order Language of Proceedings Anglais Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) Headnotes: - A party has submitted new evidence in the appeal proceedings. In view of the fact that the party had submitted other pages from the same publication in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal considers that the party has not justified that additional pages from the same publication could not reasonably have been made during the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. The evidence will thus be disregarded by the Court of Appeal. - Evidence relating to a possible new version of a contested embodiment, following statements made by the alleged infringer that a product ingredient has been changed, will be regarded in view of explanations on when and why samples of the product were purchased and analysed. Mots-clés: New evidence, R.222.2 RoP Back to Decisions and Orders